bruce
New Member
Likes: 3
Posts: 10 
|
Post by bruce on Apr 7, 2015 16:39:39 GMT
|
|
redav
Full Member
Likes: 171
Posts: 141 
|
Post by redav on Apr 7, 2015 16:40:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jaxteller007 on Apr 7, 2015 17:10:19 GMT
I mean are they hoping at this point to just get found guilty as an accessory? Bold strategy cotton, let's see how it plays out.
|
|
|
|
Post by PatDyesWholeBody on Apr 7, 2015 17:28:05 GMT
The prosecution must have done a sufficient job of placing him at the scene of the crime. Sounds like a last ditch effort to create some doubt in the jury's mind.
|
|
redav
Full Member
Likes: 171
Posts: 141
|
Post by redav on Apr 7, 2015 17:29:42 GMT
It's weird to suggest that in closing arguments. Like they're throwing up a hail mary.
|
|
HotMic
Junior Member
Likes: 56
Posts: 62
|
Post by HotMic on Apr 7, 2015 18:10:14 GMT
You forgot the tight end joke
|
|
ianc
New Member
Likes: 4
Posts: 12
|
Post by ianc on Apr 7, 2015 18:31:16 GMT
Prediction: Wide Receiver
|
|
jhooked
Junior Member
Likes: 142
Posts: 79
|
Post by jhooked on Apr 7, 2015 18:36:32 GMT
@thatgatorfanwhothoughthernandezwasinnocentbecause"freechico" |
|
|
|
Post by nole96sc on Apr 7, 2015 20:05:49 GMT
I mean are they hoping at this point to just get found guilty as an accessory? Bold strategy cotton, let's see how it plays out. I think they are hoping to convince the jury he was just an accessory. Because he also made it clear to them they didn't charge him with being an accessory so they cant find him guilty of that. So its guilty of murder or nothing. Im no lawyer but it seems like a dumb move to me. Because to the average person (like jury members) admitting you were there now after pretty much denying everything about it for the whole trial is basically saying I did it.
|
|
mch13
New Member
Likes: 20
Posts: 13
|
Post by mch13 on Apr 7, 2015 20:07:28 GMT
@thatgatorfanwhothoughthernandezwasinnocentbecause"freechico" @ttgator @shite |
|
